Re: cert discussion

[Hal Miller <hal@tera.tera.com>]

William LeFebvre writes:
> > From: pomeranz@netcom.com (Hal Pomeranz)
> > You say that the Board DID NOT set out to:
> > }   - require certification for membership
> > 
> > It seems to me that suddenly the certification IS a requirement, if 
> > somebody isn't going to get through the qualification process without it.

> I belive Hal (and the board) was referring to requiring certification
> for SAGE membership.  As in, you would not need to be certified just
> to be a member of SAGE.

Bill is correct about what I intended here.

-- 
HM