[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] Certification (was funding)

To: sage-members@usenix.org
Subject: Re: [SAGE] Certification (was funding)
From: Barb Dijker <barb@netrack.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:30:57 -0600
Cc: sage-members@usenix.org
In-Reply-To: <p0510035db7e65c2ce59c@[194.78.144.27]>
References: <200110062253.RAA22047@mailhost1.vuse.vanderbilt.edu><200110062253.RAA22047@mailhost1.vuse.vanderbilt.edu>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org

At 09:28 PM 10/7/01 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:

>         If the LISA program committee disagrees, then I think it should 
> reconsider just what exactly it means to be a "Large Installation", and 
> either change the name of the conference to be more suitable, or re-think 
> their position and just how they are going to justify their continued 
> existence to the membership.

"Large Installation" has not been part of the conference name for
about 5+ years now.  It is the "LISA, Nth system administration conference."
The large was dropped because there was no reason to restrict it by
site size.

...Barb

References:
- Re: [SAGE] Certification (was funding)
  - From: "David R. Linn" <drl@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>
- Re: [SAGE] Certification (was funding)
  - From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

Prev by Date: RE: [SAGE] Anyone use MCE for SGI support?
Next by Date: [SAGE] Servers per SysAdmin
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] Certification (was funding)
Next by thread: Please ignore: [SAGE] How to establish console ops on Sun Ultra Enterprise 2 ???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread