[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] Re: Looking for a detailed comparison, Linux vs. NT

To: sage-members@usenix.org
Subject: Re: [SAGE] Re: Looking for a detailed comparison, Linux vs. NT
From: Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:39:56 -0800
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020131233511.00aed400@pop.netaddress.com>; from dpuryear@usa.net on Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:35:27PM -0600
Mail-Followup-To: sage-members@usenix.org
References: <3C471CB3.7090108@lorentzian.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020131233511.00aed400@pop.netaddress.com>
Reply-To: Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:35:27PM -0600, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> ...
> I'd like to see some technical articles detailing the advantages and 
> disadvantages of Win2k and UNIX in relation to one another. While Win2k 
> seems to be mostly NT code, I have read about some substantial improvements 
> in overall OS functionality and enterprise readiness.

Yeah. for example, they stole BSD code to improve their networking. Big
help right there :->

References:
- [SAGE] Re: Looking for a detailed comparison, Linux vs. NT
  - From: AEleen Frisch <gaussian.com!aefrisch@gaussian.com>
- Re: [SAGE] Re: Looking for a detailed comparison, Linux vs. NT
  - From: Dustin Puryear <dpuryear@usa.net>

Prev by Date: [SAGE] OS X backup to CD-R?
Next by Date: [SAGE] OS X backup to CD-R?
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] Re: Looking for a detailed comparison, Linux vs. NT
Next by thread: [SAGE] I need your help...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread