[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy

To: Anthony Howe <achowe@snert.com>
Subject: Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
From: Alexios Zavras <zvr@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:05:10 +0300
Cc: SAGE Members <sage-members@usenix.org>, Alexios Zavras <zvr@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D6B85D9.7020108@snert.com>; from achowe@snert.com on 20020827T155953
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0208270926040.83364-100000@bowser.eecs.harvard.edu> <3D6B85D9.7020108@snert.com>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Anthony Howe wrote [edited]:
> In this regard I would choose to use Sendmail + maildrop + Courrier Mail 
> Server, which supports "maildirs" that avoid the whole need to lock a 

Why not simply the whole Courier suite:
Courier MTA + Courier IMAP
(over NFS, on a NetApp maybe, as discussed) ?
You'll also get webmail (squirrel) this way.
Theoretically, you wouldn't need sendmail at all...

-- 
-- zvr --
--  +---------------------------+       Alexios Zavras (-zvr-)
    | H eytyxia den exei enoxes |       zvr@pobox.com
    +-----------------------zvr-+

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
  - From: "Matthew Barr" <mbarr@mbarr.net>
- Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
  - From: Mark Drury <mark@drury.com>

References:
- Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
  - From: Trey Harris <trey@sage.org>
- Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
  - From: Anthony Howe <achowe@snert.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] Security Policy Templates
Next by Date: RE: [SAGE] Security Policy Templates
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
Next by thread: Re: [SAGE] SMTP/POP/IMAP mail server redundancy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread