Re: [SAGE] simple database problem

[Andrew Hume <andrew@research.att.com>]

maybe, but i hadn't thought so.
i just need more predictability about runtimes.
i can cope with variability of 1:100; but 1:1000
is too hard. i reiterate that we do not see similiar
slowdowns with any other OS we use; just linux.

On Jan 3, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Mark R.Lindsey wrote:

> Not that it helps a lot, but you've just classified your application 
> as having timing requirements, i.e., deadlines -- and therefore it 
> meets the formal definition for a real-time process.
>
> So why aren't you using a real-time operating system? ;^)
>
>
>
>                                                                        
> .
> On Jan 3, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Hume wrote:
>
>> 	is there a better way to implement this databse that will not be 
>> prone
>> to this kind of 'failure' (and make no mistake, taking 30mins is for 
>> all intents
>> and purposes, a failure)?
>
>

----
Andrew Hume  (best -> Telework) +1 732-886-1886
andrew@research.att.com  (Work) +1 973-360-8651
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and SAGE