[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC

To: SAGE mailing list <sage-members@sage.org>
Subject: Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC
From: "Strata R. Chalup" <strata@virtual.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:08:43 -0800
In-Reply-To: <8609BD9F-FB4D-4BC0-9D62-CDA354B93B4C@halligan.org>
References: <bb075cdf0511230657i138419a8r569e184315c5c536@mail.gmail.com> <20051124030857.GA26119@starshine.org> <20051124040714.GA12569@panix.com> <20051125150026.GE17959@trinity.fluff.org> <p0620071ebfad0907d9ae@[192.168.1.102]> <235B6CD2-EF0F-473B-B846-06BAC01A7308@ece.cmu.edu> <8609BD9F-FB4D-4BC0-9D62-CDA354B93B4C@halligan.org>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616


No, no, no.  Sun is a network company, and the network is the computer.

Should be about time for that one to come around on the guitar again.

SRC

Michael T. Halligan wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Didn't Mcnealy state that Sun was a software company... And then  later 
> that it was a hardware company.. And then later that it had no  worries 
> about Linux.. And later that it had always been devoted to  Linux.. And 
> later that it would never open source Solaris?

-- 
========================================================================
Strata R Chalup [KF6NBZ]                         strata "@" virtual.net
Virtual.Net Inc                                  http://www.virtual.net/
           ** Strategic IT for the Growing Enterprise **
=========================================================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC
  - From: "Michael T. Halligan" <michael@halligan.org>

References:
- [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?
  - From: Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com>
- Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?
  - From: jimd@starshine.org (Jim Dennis)
- actual technical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?)
  - From: John Clear <jac@panix.com>
- Re: actual technical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?)
  - From: Adrian Rixon <ajr@trinity.fluff.org>
- [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC (was: Re: actualtechnical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA?))
  - From: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
- Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC (was: Re: actual technical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?))
  - From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu>
- Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC (was: Re: actual technical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?))
  - From: "Michael T. Halligan" <michael@halligan.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC (was: Re: actual technical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?))
Next by Date: Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC (was: Re: actual technical questions (was Re: [SAGE] Did everyone Migrate to LOPSA ?))
Next by thread: Re: [SAGE] Solaris/x86 versus Solaris/SPARC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread