Re: [SAGE] technical help with routing on Solaris 10

[Bill LeFebvre <bill@lefebvre.org>]

Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> I don't have Solaris 10, but at one point to make this work you would
> have needed:
> 
> 10.0.0.0	255.255.0.0
> 
> I would hope that it's not true in this day and age, but you might try
> it and see if there's any difference.

It actually doesn't matter in this case.  The netmasks file is only 
important when creating net routes.  A host route will always have a 
netmask equivalent to /32.  A check of the interfaces shows that they 
have the correct netmasks.  And I imagine that if the routes were in the 
routing table with the wrong netmasks that lots of other things would 
not work.

However, it would still be worthwile to do a "netstat -rvn" just to make 
sure that all the routes' netmasks are what you expect them to be.


-- 
		Bill LeFebvre
		Mooney 4074H
		bill@lefebvre.org