[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] cfengine

To: sage-members@sage.org
Subject: Re: [SAGE] cfengine
From: Neil Watson <sage@watson-wilson.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:39:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <454A023D.2020001@flmnh.ufl.edu>
References: <20061101192215.GF6133@watson-wilson.ca> <454A023D.2020001@flmnh.ufl.edu>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:35:41AM -0500, Dan Stoner wrote:
>Our only experience was evaluation/testing and our evaluator suggested
>that we go with puppet instead.

Puppet looks interesting.  Are you using Puppet now?  Is anyone else
using Puppet?

-- 
Neil Watson             | Debian Linux
System Administrator    | Uptime 25 days
http://watson-wilson.ca

Follow-Ups:
- Puppet (WAS Re: [SAGE] cfengine)
  - From: Dan Stoner <dstoner@flmnh.ufl.edu>

References:
- [SAGE] cfengine
  - From: Neil Watson <sage@watson-wilson.ca>
- Re: [SAGE] cfengine
  - From: Dan Stoner <dstoner@flmnh.ufl.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] cfengine
Next by Date: [SAGE] watchdog program summary + network delegation tool
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] cfengine
Next by thread: Puppet (WAS Re: [SAGE] cfengine)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread