Jim,
The important thing to consider with your response to your security team
is that you need to define a "process", not come to a technology
decision.
I work for a large financial and we have not defined technology
solutions as part of our process, we have defined criticality and
timelines.
For instance
Criticality 1 Patches - Must be applied within 7 days
Criticality 2 patches - Must be applied within 30 days
Criticality 3 patches - Must be applied quarterly, and are included in
patch "clusters" that are certified by our engineering team (Yum based)
We then have a quarterly patch process that hits every device
(exceptions can apply) applies the quarterly patch cluster to every
device in production & development, following a very similar methodology
to what you've outlined below.
Related to criticality 1 patches (like the patch Tuesday critical
stuff), every time that we have a device that is important enough to
apply "right now", it expected that the patch will just get applied and
that technology owners are responsible for making sure an environment
won't break - and they have 7 days.
It's all about management will, imho, it's not about technology
solutions.... Actual patching is the easy part.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sage-members@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-sage-members@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Ankenbrandt
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 12:29 PM
To: SAGE mailing list
Subject: [SAGE] Change control and patching for Linux
I work for a bank in the American mid-west. Our data security group has
handed down a ruling that we need to begin a routine patching process.
Joy. By routine they mean a log of patches considered, reasons they
where rejected or passed, and a defined process to follow when
installing the patches. This will be subject to audit by the Fed's and
our internal groups.
Our environment is that we are running Red Hat Linux supporting Oracle
10g RAC clusters. The problem is that by the time we start a migration
from the certification cluster, test cluster, disaster recovery cluster,
to production cluster patches may have been outdated. What with change
windows, meetings with DBA's and sign offs it may take close to a month
to complete this path. Up2date is too blunt a tool, we cannot have
different levels on different clusters. We are considering installing
yum and defining our own repositories, but any experience or group
insight would be welcome
Jim Ankenbrandt