[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[SAGE] zenoss versus nagios

To: SAGE mailing list <sage-members@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [SAGE] zenoss versus nagios
From: Neil Watson <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:10:22 -0500
Sender: owner-sage-members@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

I'm beginning to plan a migration from an old Nagios 1 server to perhaps
Nagios 3.  It appears that much has changed from version 1 to 3 meaning
that at least some of the configurations will have to be altered or even
created anew.  Last summer I helped to write a comparison on monitoring
systems.  In that paper Nagios was a front running but Zenoss came out
on top.  Now I'm considering migrating to Zenoss instead of Nagios 3.

Does anyone here have practical experience with Zenoss?  How does it
compare with Nagios?  Is it worth switching to?

--
Neil Watson             | Debian Linux
System Administrator    | Uptime 4 days
http://watson-wilson.ca

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SAGE] zenoss versus nagios
  - From: Paul Lathrop
- Re: [SAGE] zenoss versus nagios
  - From: Brian T. O'Neill
- Re: [SAGE] zenoss versus nagios
  - From: Neil Watson

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] choosing the proper max SMTP message size
Next by Date: Re: [SAGE] choosing the proper max SMTP message size
Previous by thread: Re: [SAGE] Change control and patching for Linux
Next by thread: Re: [SAGE] zenoss versus nagios
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread